TropIKA.net coverage
|
GMZ2 –Malaria vaccines
Source: TropIKA
Title of the session: GMZ2 –Malaria vaccines Date: 03 November 2009 Agenda item: Symposium 14 Session theme: Malaria Vaccines Meeting room: Shimba Chair(s): James Oloo/AMANET; Brenda Okech/ GMZ2 Consortium Presenters:
TropIKA rapporteur: Onikepe Folarin Major topics:
Keywords: Vaccine, GLURP, MSP3, clinical trial, Phase I, Phase IIb, Scope: The scope of presentations is about the hybrid GMZ2 vaccine and the outcome of the phase Ia and Ib clinical trials. REPORT ON ORIGINAL SESSIONOverviewThe session started with a brief overview of the GMZ2 consortium which is an integrated project for fostering research capacity strengthening, networking and project management and clinical trials of candidate vaccine GMZ2. The consortium consists of seven partners in Denmark, Germany, The Gambia, Gabon, Uganda, Burkina Faso and Tanzania. In the study on the rationale for combining GLURP and MSP3 to form a hybrid vaccine known as GMZ2, an approach based on study of natural immunity was employed. The aim of the study was to develop a recombinant subunit vaccine against the blood stage of the parasite that will reduce or prevent the clinical manifestations by disrupting parasite development process or mimic the natural immunity. GLURP and MSP3 were selected based on human immune response to P. falciparum. The clinical trial of the individual vaccine candidates in Dodowa, Ghana showed high levels of IgG1 and/or IgG3 to GLURP and MSP3 and was associated with protection against clinical disease in children. GLURP and MSP3 were also considered because of its easy reproducibility, immunogenicity, ability of the specific IgG to inhibit parasite growth, strong ADCI effect and relative amino acid sequence conservation. In the clinical trial on the effectiveness of the hybrid GMZ2 vaccine candidate compared with GLURP and MSP3 alone, the IFA and antibody titer level were observed to be significantly higher in early days than the individual vaccine candidates. Qualities of a good vaccine, basically the safety and efficacy, were observed in the outcome of the phase Ia GMZ2 vaccine clinical trials carried out in malaria naïve adults in Germany and phase Ib trials in adults and children aged 1-5years in Lambarene, Gabon. The vaccine was given in 3 different doses monthly for one year. End points such as humoral response efficacy, local and systemic reactions and serious adverse events (SAE) were determined. The studies showed that the hybrid vaccine was well tolerated with all local and systemic reactions disappearing after 3 days CONTEXT AND ISSUEKey facts and figuresThe rationale for the various studies carried out in these presentations was to develop a safe and effective vaccine that will not be rendered ineffective by the parasite ability to change its cloth after its exposure. Initiatives on the ground; experience/s derived
Lessons learnedHybrid vaccine candidates such as GMZ2 will be a more effective and long lasting vaccine than individual candidates. Issues raised, obstacles, difficultiesThe need to search for other vaccine candidates, development of more hybrid vaccine was raised. Other issues raised were the need to learn from other vaccines successfully produced such as hepatitis B vaccine as it might give background knowledge to malaria vaccine. Obstacles and difficulties experienced in the clinical trials were compliance by the volunteers the various level of reactions as they call for extra attention and care on the volunteers. Future plansThe future plan is to move on to the phase IIb clinical trials in children. Efforts are on-going by the consortium to begin the trial by the end of the first quarter 2010. Part of the presentations in the session included preparations by 4 sites in Gambia, Uganda, Burkina Faso and Gabon. A total of 2240 children are anticipated for this trial based on epidemiology, transmission and base line survey. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONSFrom formal presentationsHybrid vaccine will be the best vaccine that will be effective, safe and long lasting Public health ImplicationsIf an effective and safe vaccine is developed then malaria burden particularly in children will be reduced significantly and that will have effect on the MDG 6 Knowledge gap created
From open discussions/debates
Main points of agreementThe urgent need for a malaria vaccine in order to meet the MDGs 3, 4, 5 and most especially 6to find more vaccine candidates. Recommendations
Personal observations from rapporteurThe outcome of the phase II clinical trials of GMZ2 vaccines needs to be followed up Comments |
Meeting blog20 Nov 2009
Podcasts from Nairobi
|
There are no comments about this article: Please login if you want to submit a comment.