TropIKA.net coverage
|
Drugs and resistance
Source: TropIKA
Title of the session: Drugs and resistance Date: 05 November 2009 Agenda item: Scientific Session 26 Session theme: Drugs and resistance Meeting room: Tsavo Ballroom 1 Chair(s): Dr. Alexis Nzila Kemri/Wellcome Trust Laboratories Presenters:
TropIKA rapporteur: Beatrice Irungu Major topics:
Keywords:
Scope: Scope was narrow. Session covered identification of molecular markers and use of molecular markers in monitoring drug resistance. REPORT ON ORIGINAL SESSIONOverviewDrug resistance is a major problem in the fight against malaria. In this session, molecur markers (MM) as a tool for monitoring drug resistance were emphasized. A study was carried out in Gabon to find out prevalence of suphadoxine/pyrimethamine resistance alleles, SP is used for IPTPp in Gabon. In Sudan, molecular monitoring was carried out to monitor Plasmodium falciparum drug resistance in Central and Eastern Sudan. Understanding mechanism of resistance of antimalarial drug lumefantrine (LM) and identifying it MM was also discussed. Lumefantrine/artemether is now the recommended first line drug for treatment of malaria in endemic regions. There is no base line data on LM activity. A study was carried out with the main objective of identifying LM molecular markers that could be used to monitor its efficacy. MM could provide key information for the deployment of an effective national drug policy CONTEXT AND ISSUENo baseline data on LM activity which is currently being used in combination with artemether (coartem) in many countries as a first line treatment for malaria. There is need to understand its mechanisms of resistance and identify molecular markers of resistance. Can molecular markers be used as anti-malarial efficacy assessment method? Which markers are useful for monitoring drug resistance? Key facts and figuresDrug resistance is a major problem in the fight against malaria. Molecular markers can be a used as a tool for monitoring drug resistance. It can provide useful data that can be used in drawing national drug policies. Initiatives on the ground; experience/s derivedIsolates were collected and adapted to the laboratory settings. They were tested for their susceptibility towards different antimalarial drugs. To understand resistance parasites were genotyped. Research FindingsIn vitro data revealed that lumefantrine and chloroquine have an inverse relationship. This implies that use of coartem (lumefantrine/artemether) may lead to selection of chloroquine sensitive parasites. Hence continuous monitoring of coartem resistance is very important. A study in Gabon revealed that use of sulphadoxine pyrimethamine in IPTp could soon be compromised due to presence of mutant parasites from samples analyzed from pregnant women. Hence, evaluation of alternative drugs in Gabon for IPTp is urgently required. A study carried out in Eastern and central Sudan on molecular monitoring of P. falciparum drug resistance demonstrated that molecular marker studies could provide key information for the deployment of an effective national drug policy. Genes associated with artemisinin resistance were detected in this study. There is need to extend tests for artesunate outside of Asia to find out how far the resistance has spread. IL-22 is a pro-inflammatory cytokine, by whatever mechanism maybe needed by people in Cameroon to clear drug resistant parasites. Which markers are useful for monitoring drug resistance? The best marker not yet related to clinical failure. The most needed is artemisinin resistance Pfmdr1 N86Y most tested. Sompob Saralamba from Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Thailand presented an Intra-host model of malaria infection that can be used for characterizing artesunate resistance. Data obtained from this model is reproducible and support the hypothesis that increasing of parasite clearance time results from reduced efficacy of the drug at the ring stage of parasite life-cycle. It can also be used for designing alternative dosing regimens. Lessons learnedNo validated molecular marker for artemisinin yet Future plansNeed to identify artemisinin and its derivatives molecular markers and their partner drug Need to understand artemisinin mechanism of resistance FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONSFrom formal presentationsPolicy ImpactPressure of lumefantrine could lead to selection of chloroquine resistance parasites. This implies that resistance to lumefantrine will lead to reversal of chloroquine resistance. This data was in a laboratory setting. If were to happens in the field then we may see a return of chloroquine soon. Knowledge gap createdMolecular markers are an important tool for monitoring drug resistance and should be incorporated in malaria surveillance studies. From open discussions/debatesThe study in Gabon: Prevalence of SP-resistant alleles of P. falciparum isolates from pregnant women after induction of IPTp-sp in Gabon. It is too early to draw conclusion that SP will be compromised shortly from the data obtained. Which markers are useful for monitoring drug resistance? How initial age of the parasite was estimated in the Intra-host model of malaria infection? Was it assumed that the movement of parasites through the stages is fixed? Is there any evidence of the hypothesized resting stage where parasite is not affected by artesunate and is it fitted in the model? Identified conclusionsMolecular marker is an important tool for monitoring drug resistance and it should be incorporated in malaria surveillance studies. Recommendations
Personal observations from rapporteurAntimalarial drug resistance is a major problem. Studies to indentify MM are important. These molecular markers will be a useful tool for monitoring drug resistance. Comments |
Meeting blog20 Nov 2009
Podcasts from Nairobi
|
There are no comments about this article: Please login if you want to submit a comment.