Communities of practiceTropIKA.net Partnerships |
Impact of programme to control elephantiasis levels off22 Jun 2010 Paul Chinnock
Source: PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
(see original article Citation: Simonsen PE, Pedersen EM, Rwegoshora RT, Malecela MN, Derua YA, et al. (2010) Lymphatic Filariasis Control in Tanzania: Effect of Repeated Mass Drug Administration with Ivermectin and Albendazole on Infection and Transmission. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 4(6): e696.
Lymphatic filariasis The main control strategy in endemic areas is mass administration of a combination of two drugs. Although this treatment rarely completely clears individuals of infection, it is believed that the reduction in the number of worms in the population as a whole will lead to a reduction, or even elimination, of LF transmission. In most cases the drugs used are diethylcarbamazine (DEC) and albendazole. However, in areas where another filarial disease – onchocerciasis Researchers collected data from the Tanga region in August 2004 – prior to the launch of a programme of annual mass drug administration (MDA) – and at intervals over the following four years, during which three rounds of MDA were completed as part of the Tanzanian National Lymphatic Filariasis Elimination Programme. The baseline data showed this population to be at high risk of LF; a quarter of the 1112 children and adults examined tested positive for the parasite, 4.1% of adults had elephantiasis of the leg, and 32.8% of adult males had hydrocoele After the first two MDA rounds, according to surveys conducted in February 2006 and May 2007, infection rates with the blood-stage larva of the parasite (microfilaria) decreased considerably; prevalence was reduced by 40% and mean intensity by over 70%. This led to a reduction in transmission. After this, however, the effects began to level off. As percentages of the baseline values, levels of infection and intensity were the same in November 2008 as they were one year earlier. To quote the authors: “The study highlights the importance of monitoring and regular evaluation in order to make evidence based programme adjustments, and it points to a need for further assessment of the long-term effect of repeated ivermectin/albendazole MDAs (including the importance of application intervals and treatment coverage), in order to optimize efforts to control LF in sub-Saharan Africa”. Even when there is good evidence to support a disease control intervention, the performance of the intervention in practice (and in specific locations) must always be monitored. The combination of ivermectin and albendazole seems, from this study, not to be as effective against LF as that of DEC/albendazole. It may be necessary to conduct MDA activities more frequently than once per year. 2010 Simonsen et al Comments |
Is your organisation working against the infectious diseases of poverty? |
There are no comments about this article: Please login if you want to submit a comment.